CHERRY HILL – The village for the second time seeks the demolition of a long unfinished mansion.

These efforts followed a series of legal defeats by property owner Denise Williams, who began building a large house in 2009 in the elite Voken tract.

A Supreme Court judge has scheduled a hearing next month on the township’s motion to order the demolition of a 20,000-square-foot facility.

The township authorities also want to bill Williams for the demolition of the house.

The three-storey building, still far from completion, rises above the mostly bare plot of 1½ hectare, fenced off from the densely wooded neighborhood of the palace houses.

Read more:The OPRA activist wins the fight against Lawnside for recording the lawyer’s invoices

Read more:George Norcross is demanding a record of the transactions as the battle with the Republic Bank continues

The house on the 1,100th quarter of Winding Drive has no facade and has been insulated for several years.

Cherry Hill officials have asked a judge to authorize the demolition of a long-unfinished mansion on Winding Drive in the elite Voken Tract neighborhood.

Earlier in June 2019, the township filed a demolition claim, citing the expiration of Williams ’building permit in late 2015.

But in October 2019, a state judge granted Williams a reprieve, saying she should be able to appeal a $ 26,000 fine related to her lack of a building permit.

Supreme Court Justice Michael Kassel also gave Williams 60 days after her appeal process to obtain a new permit and pay the fine.

The appeals process ended in October 2021, when the state Supreme Court refused to hear the dispute. This left intact previous decisions against Williams, a municipal court judge, another state judge and a two-judge panel of appeals.

Earlier this year, the township moved to demolition again, saying Williams had not met Kassel’s terms.

Cherry Hill officials want to demolish an unfinished mansion on Winding Drive in the Voken Tract neighborhood.

Supreme Court Justice Mark Chase in Camden has scheduled a hearing on the request for March 22nd.

Lawyers for the township and Williams could not get immediate comment.

In a May 2021 decision, the Court of Appeals noted Williams ’assertion that the house“ is not damaged. It will be a mansion. ” She also claimed that the multimillion-dollar project faced funding delays due to the township’s actions, among other problems.

Source link

Previous articleTri-Town News, February 23rd
Next articleNJ Spotlight News: February 21, 2022 | Video